<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Comments for Missing something</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/11/13/missing-something" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/11/13/missing-something" />
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2007://4-</id>
    <updated>2006-03-20T22:07:41Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The man, the legend.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type -en-trunk--20070910</generator>
 

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1733-comment:1701</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1733" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/11/13/missing-something"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/11/13/missing-something#c1701" />
    <title>Comment from Lacy on 2003-11-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lacy</name>
        <uri>http://www.silverberry.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.silverberry.org">
        I don't have a Mac, but if they have less security updates than PC's then I'm sure I would love them.   I have about 40 people on my network at work -- and the other day I was installing a new program for one of the higher-ups.  The Windows Update flashed up on the screen, and I figured I would go ahead and install the updates for him while I was working.  I was completely shocked when I discovered that he had almost 40 security updates to complete -- evidently he had just been clicking "install later" every time the update window popped up over the past 6-7 months.  So it took almost two hours to install all these updates from our friends at Microsoft.  Why can't they just recompile XP and give us all a new copy?  Ugh!!!]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-11-14T17:07:03Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1733-comment:1702</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1733" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/11/13/missing-something"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/11/13/missing-something#c1702" />
    <title>Comment from ceejayoz on 2003-11-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>ceejayoz</name>
        <uri>http://www.ceejayoz.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ceejayoz.com/">
        At least Microsoft doesn't <a href="http://www.securitypipeline.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=16000149" rel="nofollow">make you pay $129 to patch a kernel buffer overflow</a>... for an OS that had been the latest version until just a day before!]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-11-14T22:04:07Z</published>
</entry>


</feed>
